Azure 2 min read

Observability on a Budget: What to Keep When You Cannot Keep Everything

Telemetry bills grow faster than traffic. A pragmatic ordering of what to sample, what to aggregate and what to throw away first.

Observability on a Budget: What to Keep When You Cannot Keep Everything
Azure · September 18, 2026

Every team hits the moment where the observability bill exceeds the compute bill. The instinct is to cut evenly across the board, which is exactly wrong: it degrades the signals you need during incidents while preserving the ones you never look at.

Cut in order of value, not of volume.

Keep first: the cheap, high-signal stuff

  • Metrics are aggregates. They are tiny, permanent and answer "is it broken and since when?". Never cut these.
  • Synthetic checks from a few regions cost almost nothing and catch outages your users would otherwise report.
  • Error logs, sampled at 100%. Errors are rare by definition; keeping all of them is cheap and priceless.

Sample aggressively: the verbose stuff

  • Success logs at info level. This is usually the single largest line item. Sampling 1–10% of happy-path logs loses almost nothing diagnostically.
  • Traces. Head-based sampling at 1–10% is fine for most teams. If you need the rare slow request, use tail-based sampling to keep traces that crossed a latency or error threshold and drop the boring ones.
  • Debug logs. Off by default, toggleable per component at runtime. Shipping them always is burning money on data nobody reads.

A concrete ordering

Signal Default Why
Metrics (RED + saturation) keep 100% tiny, always needed
Error logs keep 100% rare, critical
Success logs sample 1–10% huge volume, low value
Traces sample 1–10%, tail-keep errors volume scales with traffic
Debug logs off enable on demand
Full request payloads never PII risk, enormous

Make retention a decision, not a default

Thirty days of traces is rarely worth thirty times the cost of three. Metrics can live a year at low resolution; high-cardinality traces cannot. Set retention per signal, and revisit it when the bill moves.

The goal is not less telemetry. It is telemetry whose cost you chose.

Tools like Prometheus for metrics and a sampled pipeline for traces get most teams to a bill they can defend. The discipline — keep the aggregates, sample the floods — matters more than the vendor.

PB
Written by

Parul Bedi

Part of the Azure Gravy writing team.

Up next

GitOps Changes What Your Pipeline Is Allowed to Do

Kubernetes September 24, 2026 2 min read
Open post

Conversation

0 comments

No comments yet. Start the conversation below.

Leave a comment

Replying to a comment.
Be kind. Markdown is not supported in comments.
Keep reading

Related posts

All posts